Template talk:Anonblock hard

Contested deletion[edit]

Exactly why is this a misrepresentation of policy? And why did an IP tag it? White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 19:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea, but there's something else I'm wondering about – what does this part of the template mean: If you are an registered editor, and would like to be unblocked? "Un registered user"? Is that "a registered user" or a "an unregistered user"? – Uanfala (talk) 20:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An IP tagged it because they don't like it as presently worded. Just look at the revision history, and see also this thread. --Redrose64 (talk) 00:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 3 June 2022 - Visual editor ease of use[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit template-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Currently, if the example of how to use the unblock template is copied and pasted using the visual editor, it doesnt correctly substitute and use the template. Changing to to a plain version of {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} (<code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>) instead of the existing tlx implementation would fix this. See this conversation for further details. Aidan9382 _(talk) 18:36, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^put'r there 19:00, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exemption text add request[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit template-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Please implement my changes in the template sandbox. The reason is if an IP address is hard blocked logged in users should be able to request IP block exemption. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 21:39, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: Is there a consensus discussion that led to this edit request? If so, please link to it. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:40, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not at the moment, is this change a bit controversial? There have only ever been a couple or so edit requests on this page and this template is not used so much on talk pages (though I do not know how many active blocks use this at the moment). I have thought about potentially merging this template with Template:Anonblock but I decided against a nomination because I do not want to affect dozens upon dozens of blocks that use this specific template. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 12:25, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]