Template talk:Aberystwith and Welsh Coast Railway

Trains Portal

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This template is supported by WikiProject UK Railways.

Wales Mid‑importance

	Wales portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Mid	This template has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Incorrect spelling of name in template title[edit]

The correct title of this template is the Aberystwith & Welsh Coast Railway not the Aberystwyth and Welsh Coast Railway.

See Aberystwith and Welsh Coast Railway 86.132.92.79 (talk) 11:42, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stations added later[edit]

How should the stations added after the company be portrayed? They shouldn't be presented in the same style as the original stations, as they weren't around at the time the Aberystwith and Welsh Coast Railway Company was in existence. However it feels strange to remove them entirely, but to keep the Porthdinllaen extension, which was never built, but obviously intended to be. For the stations where the line they lie on was also built later, those between Barmouth and Pwllheli and those on the Glandovey Deviation, an answer is fairly easy: using the 'L...' style icons, as used for the Porthdinllaen extension. However, for the others, including Aberdovey (non-harbour) and Glandovey Junction at each end of the Glandovey Deviation, I have no idea.

As far as I can tell, the affected stations are:

Track and station built later:

Pwllheli–Barmouth (inclusive)
Penheilig–Gogarth (inclusive)

Station built later:

Arthog
Llangelynin
Tonfanau
Aberdovey (non-harbour)
Glandovey Junction

I would appreciate any views or suggestions on the matter. WT79 ^{(speak to me | editing patterns | what I been doing)} 21:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging possibly interested users @Pencefn, Steamybrian2, Psulagain, and Xenophon Philosopher:.

Also, there is Fairbourne, which is on the same site as, but in a way not the same station as, Barmouth Ferry, the temporary terminus whilst Barmouth Bridge was being built. I have not changed this in the template, with this discussion in progress, but it should be considered as well. WT79 ^{(speak to me | editing patterns | what I been doing)} 07:04, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since it was queries originally raised by me, I will take a back seat over this matter in order that other named constributors can express their views on the said matter.

Xenophon Philosopher (talk) 19:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Xenophon Philosopher: it was queries originally raised by me Where have you originally raised these queries? WT79 ^{(speak to me | editing patterns | what I been doing)} 11:46, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Poor generalisation on my part. If you recall, it was the spelling of the word of the town in the title of this railway which was the subject of earlier discissions and not what is the raison d'etre of this current discussion. My apologies to all concerned.

Xenophon Philosopher (talk) 11:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]