Template:Did you know nominations/White Privilege II

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Jolly Ω Janner 05:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

White Privilege II[edit]

Created by Yanping Nora Soong (talk). Self-nominated at 13:57, 23 January 2016 (UTC) QPQ review here

  • The C of E, why are you demanding a QPQ review of someone who has never had a DYK nomination before? New DYK nominators can, of course, voluntarily contribute a review, but they are not required to do a QPQ for their first five nominations. What did you see that led you to think that one was required here? BlueMoonset (talk) 03:30, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Full review still needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Size plenty big enough, age ok, written neutrally, ALT1 is probably the best hook and is faithful to source. Earwig's tool shows up quotes so is a bit inflated but ok. good to go. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC)