Template:Did you know nominations/Wells St Andrew

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by HalfGig talk 14:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Wells St Andrew[edit]

Created by Argovian (talk). Self nominated at 20:03, 6 January 2015 (UTC).

  • The article is new (created on 6 January 2014) and long enough. No copyvio detected. Hook is cited with an inline citation. Borsoka (talk) 04:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
  • The last paragraph lacks any cite at all, and the second half of the fourth paragraph is quoting the word "purposeful" without providing the source from which this information was taken. Yoninah (talk) 22:10, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
  • I have improved the article and added further references. Argovian (talk) 23:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you. But I don't see the information being cited in footnote 6 in the website, and another paragraph is now missing a cite. Yoninah (talk) 00:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
  • I trust I have now sorted out the article! Argovian (talk) 01:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you, the new ref and cites improve the page. All cites in order. I like the original hook best; both hook refs are offline and therefore AGF. Both hooks cited inline. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 12:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)