Template:Did you know nominations/Six-banded armadillo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 22:33, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Six-banded armadillo[edit]

Six-banded armadillo
Six-banded armadillo
  • ... that the six-banded armadillo (pictured) can store fat to survive during times of food scarcity?

5x expanded by Sainsf (talk). Self-nominated at 11:29, 29 May 2016 (UTC).

  • On it. — LlywelynII 14:46, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

    Long enough (~8.5k elig. chars.); timely 5× expansion; well-sourced; ngram supports that "six-banded armadillo" is more common than "yellow"; WP:ENGVAR issues fixed; no copyvio; QPQ done; pic works well and is issue-free; hooks are cited and terse enough but banal: every animal stores fat for times of food scarcity (that is precisely what fat is) and third-largest isn't terribly notable or interesting. Thank you so much for improving the page but can you think of anything more notable or interesting about this armadillo? — LlywelynII 15:20, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
  • ALT2 ... that although the six-banded armadillo (pictured) feeds on carrion, small invertebrates and insects, a myth persists that it feeds on "rotting human corpses"?
  • ALT3 ... that the six-banded armadillo (pictured) are reportedly hunted for medicinal purposes?
  • ALT4 ... that the six-banded armadillo (pictured) populations north of the Amazon River might be declining due to human settlement and industrial expansion?
Some suggested alt hooks above. — Maile (talk) 00:40, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Thanks for the review, and to Maile66 for his/her kind assistance. Meanwhile I have been searching for more hooks, and came up with this one (not sure how to insert (pictured), though): Sainsf (talk · contribs) 01:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Date, length, hook, age, and everything else checks out for the new revisions. I would suggest either ALT2 or ALT5 as the strongest candidates. ALT4 can be said about pretty much an animal in the world and the "probably" weakens ALT3 in comparison to ALT2 and ALT5. Otherwise, it looks ready to go and much improved over the original submission. Aoba47 (talk) 22:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Yeah, it's good now. Let's go with ALT5. ALT2 and 3 are checked, too, but "reportedly" weakens 3 and 2 is problematic. The word "myth" is unsupported and even changing it, if they feed on carrion, in all likelihood they do feed on human corpses that are left out or in a shallow enough grave. There's nothing iffy about it and the source simply uses "belief", not any form of "mistaken belief". — LlywelynII 04:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)