Template:Did you know nominations/Polish nationalism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 11:12, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Polish nationalism[edit]

Created by Piotrus (talk), R-41 (talk). Nominated by Piotrus (talk) at 09:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC).

  • , but please specify whether it was 5x expanded or not and there are a few typos. Clean them up otherwise its good to go. Sohambanerjee1998 13:46, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Piotrus, the article is 5x expanded though its stated that its created by you two, Typos and few grammar mistakes are there though I don't know whether it was just like that it the source since I am don't know much about the topic, for example oftheir -> of their etc. You are the article creators therefore I advice you to copy-edit it. Sohambanerjee1998 14:01, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Plus please give me the name of the reference from where you are citing the hook. Sohambanerjee1998 14:03, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
C/e done. Refs should be clear in text; [1] should support the hook, if not, see other refs in the paragraphs dealing with ethnicity and religion - they should be accessible online. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:47, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
The reference supports along with other ones. So no issues there. Sohambanerjee1998 13:33, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Check points:

  • Created or Expanded 5x - checkY
  • Image - Not used.
  • Prose Size - checkY, 481 words, readable prose size
  • QPQ - checkY, not much to say here.
  • Neutral, close paraphrasing, unsourced - checkY
  • Hook - 171 words, umm needs shortening plus its a negative one moreover its long and not interesting enough.

Other than the hook its GTG. Sohambanerjee1998 14:30, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

  • ALT1 hook looks good; I just changed "became" to "is". Hook ref verified. Newness, length, refs and QPQ already approved above. I just did a little more copyediting and wikifying, and do not see any grammatical or copyediting issues. ALT1 good to go. Yoninah (talk) 20:09, 30 October 2013 (UTC)