Template:Did you know nominations/Pick's theorem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 09:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Pick's theorem

Improved to Good Article status by David Eppstein (talk). Self-nominated at 00:20, 8 July 2021 (UTC).

  • Article is new as improved to GA-status, i, is long enough and neutral. It cites sources inline. "Earwig's Copyvio Detector" complaints a moderate rate (32.0%) of text similarity found in the lede. I guess a rewording is necessary. Someone with more knowledge can comment. The hook is well-formatted and interesting. Its length is within limit. It is accurate with inline reference QPQ was done. Approval will follow when the issue with the lede is cleared. CeeGee 09:01, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
    • @CeeGee: The Earwig hits are from some web content-scraper that got the content from us. I don't suggest you click on that dubious link to verify it, but instead just look at the text in the "source" window of the Earwig report: it is a spammy concatenation of unrelated text, there only to make a spammy page get hits. Rewording is not necessary. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:22, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Good to go after following the recommendation of David Eppstein. CeeGee 08:14, 13 July 2021 (UTC)