Template:Did you know nominations/Nyāya Sūtras
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Jolly Ω Janner 05:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Nyāya Sūtras[edit]
Nyayasutras: how we learn?
... that Nyāya Sūtras is a Hindu Sanskrit text, composed before 2nd-century CE, on how we gain knowledge (pictured) and on logic, but it makes no mention of Vedic rituals?
ALT1: ... that the Hindu Sanskrit text Nyāya Sūtras, composed before 2nd-century CE, discusses sixteen categories of knowledge including perception, inference, comparison and testimony of reliable sources?- Reviewed: DYK Gopi_Talav
5x expanded by Ms Sarah Welch (talk). Self-nominated at 19:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC).
This is an impressive five-fold expansion on a subject of which I know nothing. The image is appropriately licensed and the article is neutral and amply supported by citations to sources unavailable to me. My queries are about the hook; once you start mentioning dates, you need to be accurate, and if the text might have been written in the 2nd-century CE, you need to say "before the 1st-century CE". Simple hooks are better than complex ones, in my view, and I put forward ALT2 for your considerationALT2:... that the ancient Hindu Sanskrit text Nyāya Sūtras focuses on knowledge and logic but makes no mention of Vedic rituals?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cwmhiraeth (talk • contribs) 06:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Did you mean "before the 3rd-century CE", to reflect abundance of caution? The "before the 1st-century CE" would be inconsistent with the article and what scholarly articles write. The 3rd-century wording would be consistent with the sources in the article. See Potter citation for the terminus ante quem on page 220 (I added a url for easier WP:V). I like your ALT2 suggestion. Here is another simpler hook than ALT1,
ALT3: ... that the pre-3rd century CE Nyāya Sūtras text of Hindu philosophy is a treatise on knowledge and logic which was studied by ancient scholars of Buddhism?- Thank you for your review. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 10:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- I am with you now. I think in terms of AD and BC, and the terms CE and BCE are unfamiliar to me. You could have ALT4. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- ALT4: ... that the ancient Nyāya Sūtras text of Hindu philosophy is a treatise on knowledge and logic which was studied by scholars of Buddhism in the 2nd century CE?
- I like ALT4. Thank you. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 12:03, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Going with ALT4 then. I think it is all right for me to approve a hook I suggested because it does not introduce any new facts. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:03, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
