Template:Did you know nominations/Martin F. Tanahey

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Narutolovehinata5 talk 00:09, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Martin F. Tanahey

(
)

Improved to Good Article status by John M Wolfson (talk). Self-nominated at 20:19, 3 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Martin F. Tanahey; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @John M Wolfson: Good article. But I feel as if a better hook could be made here. - Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:45, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

  • A ping to John M Wolfson :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:47, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
    • I've been occupied elsewhere, but am open to other hooks. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 01:08, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
      • @John M Wolfson: All good, but I'll tell you that the quickest way to move the nomination forward (and avoid closure) is to suggest new hooks of your own. If the reviewer suggests the hooks, they can't approve them, and if no one stops by and says anything, the nomination can be closed for lack of a viable hook. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 03:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
  • How about ALT1 ... that Martin F. Tanahey died only months after his colleague Peter J. Hamill from the same district?
    Sure, might not be as interesting without context, but someone could tweak it a bit. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 00:31, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
    Without context it's not interesting at all. It mentions names unfamiliar names to the vast majority of people and doesn't even make it clear who these people are or why their deaths being close to each other is a big deal. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:09, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
    A ping to John M Wolfson :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:13, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
    I don't have anything other than ALT0, which the reviewer didn't even say was bad (simply suboptimal). – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 15:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
    John M Wolfson, the reviewer wanted a better hook, the checklist uses "n" for "hookinterest", and indeed the original hook is not interesting—a coaching party, which sounds pretty ordinary to me, and not even held by Tanahey himself—and ALT1 even less so. I looked through the article to see whether there was anything that might be interesting fodder for a hook, and came up dry. The link of the Association to Tanahey himself is not at all clear: if it was explicitly sponsored by him, that would be one thing, but the Times article doesn't mention Tanahey the individual by name, just the association, which is not a strong enough connection to him for a hook. I've struck both hooks as too far from interesting; I don't see how this nomination can proceed. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
    @John M Wolfson, Onegreatjoke, and BlueMoonset: I have to agree – regrettably, marking for closure. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 08:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Martin_F._Tanahey&oldid=1177849155"