Template:Did you know nominations/Lord Flea

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Lord Flea's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Redtigerxyz Talk 18:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC).

Lord Flea[edit]

Created by Hillbillyholiday81 (talk). Self nominated at 20:50, 15 April 2013 (UTC), ably assisted by Ghmyrtle and Martinevans123.

  • This may be what I'd consider my first true "review" but, barring any uneducated misses, I'll stand by it; Hillbilly has made it easy...
New enough.
Long enough.
Policy... Neutral: yes. Sourcing: clean.
Hook... Length: under 200. Content: extremely hooky. Sourced.
QPQ... as noted as "Reviewed"
Review memo: I'd say it's good to go as-is but I'll suggest: mentioning WHY he's called "Flea" (it appears in source material)? and: the first lengthy quote of Flea's, maybe you wanna indent that into its own "quote" paragraph to separate it from the block of text its tucked into? and: there's a confusing set of [brackets] down in the body i don't really understand the usage? and: any way to successfully break up the lengthy "career" section (maybe segregating the "quote" suggested above will accomplish that)?
General kudos: this is an informative article about an interesting subject, reported nicely! Penwatchdog (talk) 06:04, 21 April 2013 (UTC)