Template:Did you know nominations/Embassy of Japan, Seoul

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:07, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Embassy of Japan, Seoul[edit]

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self-nominated at 03:11, 23 June 2017 (UTC).

  • New and long enuf (barely), but I have a small gripe with the hook -- where's the bit on "downright ransacking"? Also a car is not a truck. Kingoflettuce (talk) 15:31, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
  • @Piotrus:@Kingoflettuce: The quote about ransacking looks like it checks out. If we said "vehicle-ramming" instead would that be better? ♠PMC(talk) 21:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Using "vehicle-ramming" would certainly be better than "car-ramming" if it was a truck that did the ramming; while cars and trucks are both [motor] vehicles, a truck is not a car nor is a car a truck. Of course, the more specific "truck-ramming" could also be used, and sounds far more alarming than with a car. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:48, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
ALT1: "... that the Japanese embassy in Seoul has seen decades of protests, from weekly demonstrations to incidents involving Molotov cocktails, truck-ramming, self-immolation and outright ransacking?" --Usernameunique (talk) 21:42, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
@Usernameunique: I am totally fine with ALT1 (car->truck). Thanks! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here
  • Full review needed now that hook has been set. (Original review only touched on article age and length and hook facts, omitting the many other DYK review requirements.) BlueMoonset (talk) 14:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Length, date, hook checks out. QPQ done. Copyvio, close paraphrase not found. --Soman (talk) 13:16, 19 August 2017 (UTC)