Template:Did you know nominations/Declaration of Sainte-Adresse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 02:44, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Declaration of Sainte-Adresse

  • ... that in the 1916 Declaration of Sainte-Adresse Britain, France and Russia committed to securing the political and economic independence of Belgium after the First World War? Source: The "political and economic independence" is a direct quote of the actual text of the declaration, see article.
    • ALT1: ... that although the 1916 Declaration of Sainte-Adresse guaranteed Belgian attendance at the Paris Peace Conference she was designated a nation "of limited interest" and made no major decisions? Source: "Clemenceau and Lloyd George divided the (tens of) delegations present in Paris into 'powers of general interest' that meant in fact France, Britain, the US, Italy and Japan and the others 'of limited interest' on the other hand. The 'Big Five' worked things out among themselves" from Veranneman, Jean-Michel (30 November 2018). Belgium in the Great War. Casemate Publishers. ISBN 978-1-5267-1662-0. and "Britain, France, and the United States (the Big Three) made the major decisions at the peace conference" from: Spielvogel, Jackson J. (1 January 2011). Western Civilization: Alternate Volume: Since 1300. Cengage Learning. p. 805. ISBN 978-1-133-17264-2.
    • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/9th Missouri Sharpshooter Battalion

Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 16:14, 27 October 2022 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: @Dumelow: Good article. Going to have to assume good faith on the offline sources and approve. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:51, 27 October 2022 (UTC)