Template:Did you know nominations/Criminal law in the Chase Court
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 19:30, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Criminal law in the Chase Court[edit]
- ... that Congress withdrew the U.S. Supreme Court's power to hear appeals from petitions for writs of habeas corpus in the circuit courts the first time the Court considered such a case?
- Reviewed: Iván Guzmán de Rojas
Created/expanded by Savidan (talk). Self nom at 01:34, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Length OK, AGF for offline citation; hook meets length standards, but link to article is somewhat buried deep in the hook and hidden by a generic link. Suggest something like (and please tweak if I am mangling the intent):
- ALT1 ... that the first time the Chase Court considered an appeal from a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the circuit courts, Congress withdrew the U.S. Supreme Court's power to hear those appeals?
- or
- ALT2 ... that Criminal law in the Chase Court was impacted when Congress withdrew the U.S. Supreme Court's power to hear appeals from petitions for writs of habeas corpus in the circuit courts?
- Thanks. I'm fine with ALT 1 as long as the singular/plural problem is fixed. Should be "a petition for a writ" instead of "petitions for writs" and "a circuit court" instead of "the circuit courts". Don't like the word "impacted" in ALT2. Savidan 18:18, 8 June 2012 (UTC)