Template:Did you know nominations/Byblos figurines, Temple of the Obelisks and Temple of Baalat Gebal
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:46, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Byblos figurines, Temple of the Obelisks, Temple of Baalat Gebal
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that the c. 1,500 Byblos figurines (pictured) found in the Temple of the Obelisks and Temple of Baalat Gebal have become the "poster child" of the Lebanese Tourism Ministry? Source: Steiner, Margreet L.; Killebrew, Ann E. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Levant: C. 8000-332 BCE. OUP Oxford. p. 465. ISBN 978-0-19-921297-2.
have become the 'poster child' of the Ministry of Tourism of Lebanon
Created by Onceinawhile (talk). Self-nominated at 00:24, 28 November 2019 (UTC).
- Interesting hook and nice, freely licensed image, which would be perfect for the image slot. Unfortunately, all three articles are too short and seem unfinished, and three QPQs are needed. Significance expansion is needed before this can be approved. -Zanhe (talk) 06:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- OK, thank you. I am on it. Onceinawhile (talk) 11:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- I'm sorry, but if there is no action soon, these should not go forward. --evrik (talk) 19:40, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- Byblos figurines
needs 700 characters, referencing, a QPQ,and some text to the gallery
- QPQ done. Onceinawhile (talk) 00:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Temple of the Obelisks
needs 400 characters, referencing, a QPQ, and add some text to the gallery--evrik (talk) 16:31, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- QPQ done. Onceinawhile (talk) 00:18, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Temple of Baalat Gebal
needs 400 characters, referencing, a QPQ, and add some text to the gallery
- QPQ done. Onceinawhile (talk) 00:29, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- OK I will start work on it now. Onceinawhile (talk) 22:31, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- Byblos figurines
- Alt1a ... that the 1,500 Byblos figurines (pictured) found in the Temple of the Obelisks and Temple of Baalat Gebal have become the "poster child" of the Lebanese Tourism Ministry?
- I see some progress. Temple of the Obelisks is almost ready for review. --evrik (talk) 16:31, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you @Evrik and Zanhe: I have completed the expansion of all three articles. I hope you like them! Onceinawhile (talk) 13:42, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- It appears that the fundamental problems with the three pages are now resolved and they are ready for review. --evrik (talk) 17:08, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
New. Long enough. Within policy. Hook is fine and incorporates all three articles but is absent from Temple of Baalat Gebal. I added the images of the Byblos figurines to the other two articles so it can be used for the hook in promotion. See below for issues. Fix these and I will approve. @Onceinawhile, Evrik, and Zanhe: KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:01, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- Good to go.
- Please cite the end of the second paragraph.
- Onceinawhile (talk) 11:40, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- This is the largest issue. Two paragraphs are not cited. Hook is not cited or mentioned within the article. There is no mention about the "poster child" of the Lebanese Tourism Ministry.
- @Evrik: I believe you kindly added those two paragraphs [1] a few days ago – do you remember which sources they came from? Onceinawhile (talk) 16:09, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- thank you Evrik for adding these. I have also added in and sourced the hook. Onceinawhile (talk) 19:48, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- I looked for the sources, and found something relevant. You could use this one if needed. "The archaeological site of Byblos". --evrik (talk) 20:06, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
@KAVEBEAR: thanks for your review. The comments have now been implemented. Onceinawhile (talk) 19:49, 29 December 2019 (UTC)