Template:Did you know nominations/By the Blue Hawaiian Waters

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  MPJ-DK  02:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

By the Blue Hawaiian Waters[edit]

5x expanded by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 13:25, 2 August 2016 (UTC).

  • QPQ done. New article. Length, copyvio, etc. clear. Hook is cited and interesting. (Per ANI, a second review of this nom is needed.) LavaBaron (talk) 16:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Second full review needed per ANI requirements. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Not sure if the hook stands up factually - for example: This source is all about orchestra recordings made in 1925 and including a bass saxophone. Suggest
  • ALT1: ... that a clarinet is used to mimic a Hawaiian "love-call" in Albert Ketèlbey's classical music piece By the Blue Hawaiian Waters? Taknaran (talk) 16:31, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Well, without the quotation marks, I could follow, but they clearly mark the line as someone's saying, and it doesn't claim "the first" but "one of the first" which can be true. Thanks for digging up the Stokowsky, but I see some difference that there, it's a bass part, while for the Blue Waters, the sax carries the solo melody. Sorry, ALT1 doesn't work: for too long, we don't know what the subject is, which I try to get to the beginning, - clarinet is nothing special, - "classical music piece" is raising no interest (if mentioned at all, "light classical music" would be more correct).
ALT2: ... that for his 1929 first recording of By the Blue Hawaiian Waters, composer Albert Ketèlbey used a saxophone for a Hawaiian "love-call"? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:52, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
  • [2 of 2] This article is new enough and long enough. The ALT2 hook facts have inline citations, (I could not access one source because I use AdBlocker), the article is neutral and I detected no copyvios. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:45, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
  • @LavaBaron: - Your original review was completed before ALT2 above was added, can you please review ALT2 as well?  MPJ-DK  10:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Restoring Cwmhiraeth's AGF tick for ALT2. There's no need to go back to LavaBaron (who has just announced he's going to be away for a while); the AN requirement was that another reviewer was needed on ones that he'd reviewed, not that he needs to backstop that other reviewer if later hooks are introduced. There's no need to delay Gerda's nomination any further, since it has been checked and approved AGF. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:16, 3 September 2016 (UTC)