Template:Did you know nominations/Burnley 0–1 Lincoln City (2017)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:51, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Burnley 0–1 Lincoln City (2017)[edit]
- ... that Lincoln City's win over Burnley meant that they became the first non-league football club to reach the FA Cup quarter-finals in 103 years? Source: BBC
- Reviewed: Jesse Root Grant
- Comment:
Currently undergoing AFD so could we hold off reviewing until that has been concluded?AFD over, ready for review now.
Converted from a redirect by Grondemar (talk) and The C of E (talk). Nominated by The C of E (talk) at 09:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC).
@The C of E and Grondemar: - Looking at the article I see the actual match itself being covered in the short lead, but nowhere else in actual prose?? The main article is about the background only and then a table at the bottom, nothing about the game, aftermath etc. it's all restricted to the lead. When I read an article on Wikipedia one of my criteria is that I should be able to read the body of the article without the lead and still get all information out of it. This article does not do that. Currently it is not a "complete" article as it actually does not cover the game. If you can add a section on the game I would be happy to do a full review. MPJ-DK 02:36, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- @MPJ-DK: I have now added a section detailing the match. One thing I forgot to ask in the original submission was could we run this on the 11th March (the date of the quarter final between Lincoln and Arsenal)? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 11:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
@The C of E: - Alright it is now complete enough, also long enough and new enough at time of nomination. Hook is in article, cited and checks out in the sources as well. All paragraphs are sourced and I found no copyright violations. The QPQ review checks out and the image in the article looks to be appropriately sourced. I approve. MPJ-DK 23:26, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
