Template:Did you know nominations/Bop City

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 11:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Bop City[edit]

The house formerly occupied by Bop City, now located at 1712 Fillmore Street.
The house formerly occupied by Bop City, now located at 1712 Fillmore Street.
  • Comment: Article created in my userspace on 5 February, based on article in German Wikipedia plus own additional text, moved to mainspace on 8 February 2018 (Sydney time, I guess that's still 7 Feb in Wikipedia time!).

Created by Dmmaus (talk). Self-nominated at 22:47, 7 February 2018 (UTC).

  • This article is new enough and long enough. The image is suitably licensed. Both the hooks have inline citations and either could be used. The article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues (Earwig's concerns relate to lengthy quotations and are of no consequence). Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:16, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Hi, I came by to promote this and formatted all the URLs using shortened footnotes and Wikipedia:Citation templates. If you are going to produce more book-researched articles like this, you should make yourself familiar with these templates, especially including ISBN numbers. I removed two non-reliable sources (IMDb and wordpress), and noted one dead link which needs to be fixed or deleted. The lead should also be expanded to cover the points mentioned in the article. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 00:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your work and comments! Sorry about the citations - I copied them across from German Wikipedia and didn't think to check about reformatting them. I've added a new citation to replace the dead link. I've also expanded the lead a bit to mention some of the more notable points in the article. -dmmaus (talk) 07:07, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank you! The cites are all in place and the lead is excellent. Restoring tick per Cwmhiraeth's review. Yoninah (talk) 11:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)