Template:Did you know nominations/Bert Sincock

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 06:34, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Bert Sincock[edit]

Created/expanded by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 00:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Stub Class articles are not eligible for DYK. Maile66 (talk) 14:55, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
  • But, with 11,325 bytes and more than 20 sources, it's not a stub. Cbl62 (talk) 21:33, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
  • It was already assessed as a stub when it was listed here. I see you have removed the Stub assessment from the article. As far as I'm concerned, that resolves the issue. Maile66 (talk) 21:50, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks Maile. I don't feel comfortable assessing an article I've worked on, but the "stub" assessment was old, and I did remove that. Thanks again. Cbl62 (talk) 22:03, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Anytime I can help, just let me know. I understand your discomfort about assessing an article you've been working on. There's a discussion on the Stub subject over at Wikipedia talk:Did you know. Maile66 (talk) 23:32, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Good to go. Hook is sourced. Duplication Detector finds no copyvio. Date and length are fine. AGF on offline sources.Maile66 (talk) 14:00, 9 June 2012 (UTC)