Template:Did you know nominations/Ashley Mears

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:27, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Ashley Mears[edit]

  • ... that sociologist Ashley Mears conducted an ethnography of the fashion industry while working as a model in New York and London? Source: "She spent some time in London and found that even harder than New York. [...] In between seminars she entered a world of casting calls from early morning till late at night that she describes as "daily brushes with humiliation, insecurity, rejection and anger". Mears kept a notepad tucked into her portfolio, detailing all that she saw and interviewing models and scouts she met along the way. She told her agency what she was doing, but says: "I don't think they got it... when I said I was a PhD and I wanted to write about my experiences for research material, they were like, 'Oh, cute!'" [1]
    • ALT1:... that sociologist Ashley Mears almost abandoned her research into the fashion industry because her modeling career was going so well? Source: "At one point in the book, you admit to almost being sucked into modeling and abandoning your graduate studies. [Mears:] I started doing well. "Well," according to the standards in the industry. Objectively, I wasn't making any money. But I booked a couple of jobs for a couple of high-status designers. And I did a couple of shows at Fashion Week in New York. [2]
  • Reviewed: Exempt, 2nd DYK nomination

Created by Bakazaka (talk). Self-nominated at 18:16, 4 September 2018 (UTC).

  • New article, long enough at 3,900 chars. Uses inline citations, has lots of great sources, and is neutrally written. Copyvio check looks good - mostly properly cited quotes. I like the first hook best. Ready to go, nice work. --Krelnik (talk) 03:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)