Template:Did you know nominations/2014 NCAA Division I Women's Basketball Championship Game

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 19:26, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

2014 NCAA Division I Women's Basketball Championship Game

Created by PCN02WPS (talk). Self-nominated at 21:54, 4 April 2021 (UTC).

  • Article is long enough (2814 characters), new enough (created 4 April, nominated same day), article does not contain copyvios
  • Question? PCN02WPS The section "UConn" is unsourced, please can you add sources to that section? I assume the sources already exists in the team season article, but need to be in this article too. Also, it would be nice to have a text summary of the game, as currently this an article about a game which has very little information about the game itself (apart from the lineups and scorecard). Finally, the "Starting lineups" table violates MOS:COLOR, in particular "Do not use colored text or background unless its status is also indicated using another method, such as an accessible symbol matched to a legend, or footnote labels. Otherwise, blind users or readers accessing Wikipedia through a printout or device without a color screen will not receive that information." Whilst the colour issue won't stop this DYK from passing, it would be nice to fix.
  • Putting this nomination on hold until issues are fixed, will conduct rest of the review once it is. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:16, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Joseph2302, thanks sorry for the delay and thanks for your patience. Sources have been added to the UConn section, colors have been simplified (and WNBA Draft picks further explained in prose in that section), and a prose game summary has been added. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 04:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Apologies for the delay, this slipped my mind:
  • checkY Article is now within policy, now that issues highlighted above have been fixed. Looks a lots better now, thanks
  • checkY Hooks are short enough, interesting, in the article and well cited. Either is fine to use
  • checkY QPQ done
  • Overall, this nomination now passes. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:53, 6 May 2021 (UTC)