Talk:Zelig

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

References to use[edit]

Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article.
  • King, Mike (2008). "Zelig and the Narcissism of the Other-Directed Person". The American Cinema of Excess: Extremes of the National Mind on Film. McFarland. pp. 166–167. ISBN 0786439882.
 Done --Mauro Lanari (talk) 08:36, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Puzzling[edit]

I just want to note something puzzling, in the caption for the photo with Coolidge and Hoover, Allen is lumped in as a "posthumous camero appearance". Unless I need to watch the news more, Woody Allen's still alive and vetching. --Mfree 18:04, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • =P... I think the caption means that Coolidge and Hoover are the ones makes posthumous cameo appearances, not Allen. --User:Revoish 06:49, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zeligandwilson.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Zeligandwilson.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 19 May 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Zeligandwilson.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:12, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Typo?[edit]

In the Production section, Bruno Bettelheim is quoted as saying, "The question of weather Zelig…" Should that be whether?

I too think the Production section isn't the best place to put that information/quote. What do you suggest? --Mauro Lanari (talk) 22:42, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry: of course you're right, "whether", and not "weather". --Mauro Lanari (talk) 08:33, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reaction[edit]

The quote "mildly amusing" attributed to Time Out New York [8] http://www.timeout.com/film/newyork/reviews/78521/Zelig.html is non-existant. I have replaced it with, "a strong contender for Allen’s most fascinating film", which can be found in said source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.112.96.148 (talk) 05:17, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --Mauro Lanari (talk) 08:36, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Zelig. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oops![edit]

   Exhibiting all of my accustomed grace and daring, I botched my edit summary, and beg to make recompense here on the talk page!
   My summary'shandful of words or brief phrases were vague or confusing, incomplete, and saved thus by accident; I expect they won't be worth explicit explanation, but I try to pay attention to my talk page, so in case of obscurity on my part, ring my chimes as needed.
JerzyA (talk) 03:47, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Very clearly based on Zelda F. Scott Fitzgerald.[edit]

Woody Allen has made an entire career out of putting women in chains, why are we questioning the legitimacy of Zelda? I’m sorry, “Zelia” 🙄 68.205.19.104 (talk) 15:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]