Talk:Yurihonjō Hinakaidō

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 17:31, May 16, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Possible links for reference[edit]

Here are some links I found:

Sakigake News on the Web (and this one)
Asahi Shinbun
Mainichi Shinbun (and this one)
Information from the city
Akita Prefecture article about the festival
Web Alpha (travel site with article about the festival, requires FlashPaper)
Tenju.com
Article from Hotel Iris
Iina Tohoku
Yahoo.co.jp Travel

This should be a good start. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 05:26, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JPG picture on top page[edit]

Hello - is the jpg image identical to that of this site? : [1] Need some expert knowledge here if so - I know it is generally OK to reuse images of old paints for eg, but NG to reuse such of sculptures under Japanese copyright law. Dolls, I cannot tell. -- Mantokun (talk) 14:53, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to be the same image. Depending on how old the sculpture is, copyright may or may not apply. The image should be properly sourced, though. The uploader should be contacted and asked where the image came from. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 18:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I left a message on the uploaders talk page and tagged the file with a standard "unsourced" tag. Just for info, under the Japanese Copyright Law, photographs of three dimensional artworks are often deemed to be protected no matter how old the photographed object is. (FYI: follow to Q3, from Copyright Research and Infomation Center of Japan) -- Mantokun (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]