This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article was again asked to be SDed with G5 rationale which have had already been rejected earlier. — Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 08:27, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I will be happy to review this. I notice that the nominator and another contributor have been indefinitely blocked. I will post some initial feedback; if another editor responds to the feedback within a few days, we can continue the review. If there is no response in a few days, we will close this nomination. The article can always be nominated again later once an editor is prepared to address the resulting feedback. Larry Hockett (Talk) 08:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The lead section is far too short. It should summarize the contents of the body of the article. See WP:LEAD.
In the infobox, there is an unnecessary reference at the top. We don't need a reference for his name.
We do need a reference for the date of birth, and I don't see one.
I don't see how reference 2 (reviewit.pk) meets WP:RS (blog-style, user-generated content).
The URL for reference 3 (one of the BBC references) doesn't lead to the correct place anymore. Check the other references for this issue.
There is incorrect use of italics here and later in the article; this makes the entry hard to read. See MOS:ITALICS. For example, the names of people and companies generally should not be placed in italics.
This section is out of sequence. You mention the place of birth, family, college graduation, more family, then back to childhood.
There is a citation needed tag in this section.
I think I will stop there and await an initial response. Thanks. Larry Hockett (Talk) 09:07, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This nomination should be summarily rejected. Dtt1 was blocked for undisclosed paid advocacy, which casts into doubt all material that was added. MER-C 20:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You're right. I'm going to close this. Larry Hockett (Talk) 08:15, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
