Talk:X Tour (Ed Sheeran)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 25 September 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus - although a DAB page was added back in September, shortly after its initial listing. Tiggerjay (talk) 06:26, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure)


x Tour (Ed Sheeran tour)X Tour – Kylie's tour is not called the "X Tour", i.e. this doesn't need brackets. Unreal7 (talk) 18:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. Natg 19 (talk) 05:14, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose - X Tour has been where the Kyle article was in February, sources such as "KYLIE OPENS X TOUR IN STYLE" and the Kylie template box X Tour show that it is one of the ways in which that tour is referred to. There are in any case four X Tours by four different bands so I have converted redirect to Kylie to a dab. It may be moved out of the way if this RM decides Ed Sheeran's WP:CURRENT tour is the long term significance of X Tour. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment there's also Billy Talent X Tour, and the "X Tour" at Ambassador 21; and the "X-Tour" at Spock's Beard discography; and Japan Dome Tour X -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 05:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Only article with the title "X Tour" and the Kylie tour has a different name altogether. The ones the IP brought up are non notable. Calidum 00:36, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"Only article" is sorry irrelevant; how many times does the WP:DISAMBIGUATION guideline have to be stated? And "X Tour" is used by the Kylie Tour, the refs in the article show it in black and white. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:03, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please. This is a case of WP:IGNORE. Unreal7 (talk) 11:40, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
IAR has only been stated by you just now, not by Calidum; if you wanted to use IAR, you should have stated it from the beginning -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 08:29, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. This is the only thing actually called "x Tour" on Wikipedia. Anything else can be covered on the dab page.--Cúchullain t/c 15:31, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I see where IIO is coming from and I don't think this a completely straightforward case, but when Googling around all instances of "X Tour" seemed to relate to this article and of the other tours mentioned by IIO and the IP, none of them seemed to be referred to as simply "X Tour". Jenks24 (talk) 07:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • When Googling, if all instances relate to the Wikipedia article, that is a red flag for a made up title. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Vague, real name "x" is way over-abbreviated, "x Tour" is made up, it is not used in the references, and itself remains non-meaningful. Instead, rename to Ed Sheeran concert tour 2014-5. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • While websites and commentators referred to it as "X Tour", I can find no evidence that Sheeran, promoters or distributors ever gave the tour the proper name "X Tour". Instead, his announcements refer to tours by place and dates, and the inclusion of "x" comes from reference to the previously released x album (lowercase x at that). It is a tour following release of an album displaying a big "x", the album cover being used as illustration. http://www.edsheeran.com/news.htm and actual tickets and ticket websites contain no "X Tour" labelling. Indeed, there is also "'X' World Tour", clearly using a title font descriptive title, and the so-called "x" Tour has been extended, meaning the earlier named 2014-15 tour includes second tours of 2015. There are increasingly specific mention of concerts identified by month-year. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:26, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose "X Tour" is correct[1][2][3][4] but ambiguous. Relevant search results are primarily for this and the Chris Brown tour - which could be added to X (Chris Brown album) - but these are recent events so search results don't indicate long-term importance of these topics. Few results in Google Books but but mentions include Kylie's tour and something connected with The X-Files. Peter James (talk) 15:37, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 28 October 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved - Consensus is to Keep it at the current title, As noted below requested moves should be done after a few months of the previous one being closed ... Not 6 days!. –Davey2010Talk 22:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


– For clearer explanation as to why the Ed Sheeran tour should be the primary topic, look at the Google results for the tours of each of the other acts on the disambiguation page: [5][6][7][8], in comparison to the Ed Sheeran tour. Also, see I'm Not the Only One and (more recently) Taking Over Me for other examples of when the only topic with an article quite clearly has to be the primary topic. Unnecessary disambiguation helps no one here. Unreal7 (talk) 15:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose See Wikipedia:Recentism. Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose same reasons as before and speedy close only six days after the last close. Give it a couple of months please. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose and six month moratorium In ictu oculi (talk) 01:23, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • STRONG speedy procedural CLOSE this was just discussed and just closed and was proposed by the same nominator. Nominator should be trouted -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 03:48, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment if the nominator doesn't like the closure, they should use WP:MRV -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 03:49, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose and procedural close – Aside from the various topics explicitly listed at X Tour, there are lots of bands called "X" and lots of albums called "X" and lots of songs called "X" and lots of radio stations called "X" (see X (disambiguation)). A tour for any one of those would be called an X Tour. There are just way too many possibilities here. Also, I believe Wikipedia software cannot distinguish between "X Tour" and "X Tour", and it is way too soon to submit this suggestion after the RM that just closed that proposed the same thing. —BarrelProof (talk) 16:50, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Close for now, per above. Also, this page should be located at X Tour (Ed Sheeran) (see Greatest Hits Tour). © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 03:12, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 1 November 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved per WP:TOURDAB. Opposition was also countered without reply (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk) 01:51, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


X Tour (Ed Sheeran tour)X Tour (Ed Sheeran) – Per WP:TOURDAB. There is no X Tour (Ed Sheeran album) or X Tour (Ed Sheeran video) to further disambiguate with one redundant classifier. I'm neutral to moving this to X Tour. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 05:03, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Question again, how much actual discussion has gone into WP:TOURDAB? Because if that style is suggested then it runs counter to WP:TITLE and WP:CRITERIA. Current disambiguation is not overprecise because without "tour" normally could be anything. In this case the word Tour is in the title so not so unhelpful but overall Oppose removing tour from tour article dabs - what possible benefit to anyone? The Wikipedia:WikiProject Concert Tours guideline evidently needs wider out of Project discussion. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:28, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, this is written in a WikiProject page. If you consider that the writing of that WikiProject is incorrect, *you* must contest it in the WikiProject talk page first, and if you manage to remove such statement(s), you will have a point, not before. Second, having twice "tour" in an article's title is redundant and unnatural; I don't see how this goes against criteria and in general with wp:title: how is that "X Tour (Ed Sheeran)" is not understandable for a person, but "On the Run (Paul McCartney)" is? Third, we don't use distinguishers in the following titles: The Hill (Knoxville), El Universal (Caracas), King Range (Antarctica), Subway (Homicide: Life on the Street), thousands of etc., yet, all of these work because you even if don't have an idea what they are, the article text will do it, as recognizability suggest. Also, the additional "tour" goes against "Conciseness" and "Consistency" in WP:CRITERIA, which you are using to oppose. You better, with your own words and not copy-pastes of the guideline we can all access, explain how's that the proposed title is not concise, natural, consistent, precise, and recognizale enough. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 08:50, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Given the lack of any other Ed Sheeran-related topics, including the word "tour" twice in the same title is redundant.--Cúchullain t/c 22:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.