Talk:X (Kylie Minogue album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleX (Kylie Minogue album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 3, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
August 26, 2021Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
September 1, 2021Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 17, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that music producer Mylo briefly posted two of his rejected tracks for Kylie Minogue's tenth studio album X online, before the album release?
Current status: Good article

Sales certifications[edit]

I have doubts about X being certified in some of those countries mentioned in the chart section.Someone please verify it.--Jandkay (talk) 04:25, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scissor Sisters[edit]

I thought the Scissor Sisters (or members of the) were gonna play a role in this album? Arthurian Legend 13:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

True, however none of their tracks, nor Groove Armada's etc, were used in the final tracklist. PatrickJ83 21:38, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The first single, Two Hearts, sounds very Scissor Sisters-y, though. Arthurian Legend 05:22, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 02:39, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reading?[edit]

Does anyone know if it has been mentioned, how the title is intended to be read? Is it supposed to be "eks" or is it ten? I had assumed it was "eks" until I realised this morning, it could in fact be "ten" since I've never seen it written out anywhere. Anyone know? - EstoyAquí(t • c • e) 08:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pronounce it like the letter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.122.166.26 (talk) 00:47, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its pronounced like the letter because when her music video for premeired she said it was from her tenth album "x" THOUGH THERE IS A DOUBLE MEANING BECAUSE x is her tenth studio album and as we all know, x is the roman numeral for ten. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.131.47.196 (talk) 19:36, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Isn't this just free advertising for an artist and her record label? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Folk smith (talk • contribs) 13:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. If you review policies and guidelines, albums by notable musicians often have their own article, and are not done to promote anything, but to give information about the album. There are reliable sources, and it is written neutrally, presenting facts about the album. Ariel♥Gold 13:59, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Album formats[edit]

Is anyone going to add the mention that at least in the UK the album was released as a USB stick and its content? Very few releases are being produced in this format and seldom seen in stores and since the design of the actual memory stick and box are quite unique we could include a picture? Dollvalley (talk) 06:48, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second single[edit]

Wikipedia current has "The One" as the second single while I have heard that "Wow" will be the next single. Does anyone have any official information as to her next single? Thanks. --Lakeyboy (talk) 22:27, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you dont know what the next single is, please do not recreate redirected articles. So far articles for "Wow", "Speakerphone" and "Heart Beat Rock" have been redirected. Without a source, they will be reverted - wait for official announcement from either the record label or official Kylie website... thanks! - eo (talk) 22:54, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MYLO BEEF[edit]

"He was shocked when the final product was released without any of his tracks included, and became a big crybaby about it."

Is this what the article really said? Hilarious, but I'm not sure if it sounds quite right. Puckeylut (talk) 22:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I want to know how high this album peaked on the Billboard 200. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.45.111.67 (talk) 04:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speakerphone next single?[edit]

According to this reliable site, [1], Speakerphone has charted in Canada. This surely means its released as a single. Something similar had happened with Early Winter, it had charted similarly, no one believed that it will be a single, but ultimately it did. I am feeling confident that it is a single. People who work on Kylie Minogue can do some research. I have no intentions of making the page. Indianescence (talk) 12:12, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It did chart for one week on December 15, 2007.... this was 4 months ago now. Not sure if it hit the chart due to some radio airplay? As far as I know the song has not been released on its own in Canada, nor anywhere else. I think the label is still trying to work "All I See" in North America right now. - eo (talk) 13:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

“TBA (2009)” ?[edit]

Will Kylie release her 11. studioalbum? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.44.158.115 (talk) 19:50, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Kylie announced via her MySpace page on 11/14/08...

A BOOMBOX OF REMIXES FROM KYLIE!

Kylie releases 'Boombox', a collection of remixes through Parlophone on January 5th 2009! The album features some of Kylie's most popular tracks, and some lesser known gems remixed to perfection by some of the best dance producers around including Chemical Brothers, Fischerspooner, Mylo and Sebastien Leger.

The tracklisting for the CD album is as follows:

1. Can't Get Blue Monday Out Of My Head (Bootleg with New Order) 2. Spinning Around (7th District Club Mental Mix) 3. Wow (Death Metal Diva Scene Mix) 4. Love At First Sight (Kid Creme Vocal Dub) 5. Slow (Chemical Brothers Mix) 6. Come Into My World (Fischerspooner Mix) 7. Red Blooded Woman (Whitey Mix) 8. I Believe In You (Mylo Mix) 9. In Your Eyes (Knuckleheadz Mix) 10. 2 Hearts (Mark Brown's Pacha Ibiza Upper Terrace Mix) 11. On A Night Like This (Bini & Martini Mix) 12. Giving You Up (Ritron Re-Rub Vocal Mix) 13. In My Arms (Sebastien Leger Vocal Mix) 14. The One (Britrocka Remix) 15. Your Disco Needs You (Casino Mix) 16. Boombox (LA Riots Remix)

iTunes customers can download the following exclusive tracks in addition to the above:

Can't Get You Out Of My Head (Greg Kurstin 2007 Mix) Butterfly (Mark Piccotti Sandstorm Dub) 209.64.87.68 (talk) 16:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Sophisticated' ?[edit]

'Sophisticated' (2009) the new Kylie Minogue album?

Sales of X in Spain[edit]

I've edited like a hundred times and someone who calls himself a "FAN" is changing it everytime. X is not Gold (Oro) in Spain. It had a terrible chart-run: 28 - 71 - 83 - 99. And it droped out of the chart without any certification. So, please, stop adding false information. Do you think you're a better fan or you make Kylie a better singer by posting false information???? Rub rb (talk) 11:29, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop changing the charts![edit]

Okay,X was number 1 on the international charts of Taiwan and Greece,ok? It charted in Japan as well at 13 on the international chart and 40 on the overall chart.Also chart at 5 in EUropean albums chart and 9 on the world chart.

Copyrighted image over-use has been fixed.[edit]

How come after I removed the Australian & Asian Tour Edition covers someone put the image over-use notice back up? It can't be because there are 2 copyrighted images becuae many articals have at least two and the images are also both low-resolution and can't be used for piracy. So now that there is not 4 copyrighted images rather there is only 2 (Standard Edition & Special Edition) I ask that whoever keeps doing this please stop because the problem has been resolved.

Mirrored Love (talk) 01:06, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read my edit summaries. There are 6 unfree sound files, which is too much for an article about one album. I realize that the tag says excessive use of images but that's an issue with the tag, and there does not seem to be a tag for excessive use of sound files. I'm trying to address that shortfall. For purposes of our copyright policy image files and sound files are linked together. ie they are all files and is this case, all unfree. The point of adding the tag is so that the article is listed for copyright review by editors who are looking at copyright issues, rather than editors that are looking only at this article. Bottom line is someone needs to look at the sound files and make some choices. The only reason I haven't simply removed them all is that I think that would be unfair to the editors who put this article together, but the number of sound files needs to be trimmed down. There's no justification to use more than one, especially considering that the fair use rationales do not give any unique information that compellingly addresses the need to use any of these sound files. Thanks. Rossrs (talk) 01:14, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Related song pages[edit]

I've noticed that "Heart Beat Rock" and "Speakerphone" were redirected to this page and I was just curious if that was because they were said to be singles or songsTheJoJoFredo (talk) 14:58, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:X (Kylie Minogue album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Start class:
  • Green tickY A reasonably complete infobox
  • Green tickY A lead section giving an overview of the album
  • Green tickY A track listing
  • Green tickY Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient)
  • Green tickY Categorisation at least by artist and year

C class:

  • Green tickY All the start class criteria
  • Green tickY A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
  • Green tickY At least one other section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
  • Green tickY A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
  • Green tickY A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.
  • Green tickY Independent in-line references supporting major/controversial claims

B class:

  • Green tickY All the C class criteria
  • Green tickY A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
  • Green tickY A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
  • Green tickY No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
  • Green tickY No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:08, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Red XN No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
This article lacks a lot of sources actually! I'm lowering the rating. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:51, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 17:51, 11 December 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 10:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on X (Kylie Minogue album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source for "Speakerphone" statement[edit]

Hello everyone. I noticed the following statement (The song "Speakerphone" was initially rejected by the label, but was later accepted by it) in the article, and I was wondering if anyone had a source to back this up. I was only curious because I was doing some minor work on the "Speakerphone" article so if there is a source, it would be nice to add that information to the song's article too. Thank you in advance! Aoba47 (talk) 02:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aoba47! I recently expanded the article and haven't found any source to back this statement. Damian Vo (talk) 03:01, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the update. It sounds like it was speculation from the time. Aoba47 (talk) 23:11, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 07:12, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(
)

Improved to Good Article status by Damian Vo (talk). Self-nominated at 09:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is new enough (GA), long enough and sourced. No copyvio and qpq is done. Hooks are cited and interesting. Striking ALT2 because the source doesn't exactly say that they used any of the rejected material in their album. Other than that this looks good! BuySomeApples (talk) 19:29, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review! Damian Vo (talk) 21:23, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Damian Vo, the hooks used to just have X in bold. I shifted some more text into the bold link (without changing any text) to make it more visible and likely to be clicked on. If you prefer it the original way, feel free to restore it. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 21:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's fine. Thanks a bunch! Damian Vo (talk) 21:23, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ALT0 to T:DYK/P3
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:X_(Kylie_Minogue_album)&oldid=1160940999"