Talk:Worsley Navigable Levels

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK Waterways Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Waterways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Waterways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK WaterwaysWikipedia:WikiProject UK WaterwaysTemplate:WikiProject UK WaterwaysUK Waterways articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greater Manchester Low‑importance

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mining Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Entrance to Worsley Navigable Levels at Worsley Delph[edit]

Coordinates of entrance. 53 30'02.2"N 2 22'52.2"W. It is very difficult to provide the surface coordinates of significant underground structures unfortunately. Tina Cordon 14:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Classification[edit]

I don't think I understand what classification is all about. Are you rating the article or the importance of the subject matter? Tina Cordon (talk) 21:25, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article - when this article was last classified, C-class was not available. Given the amount of information I would say its just beyond Start-Class, but the lack of inline citations for me makes it certainly not B-class. The importance of the subject matter is covered in WP:NOTE Parrot of Doom (talk) 22:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On that basis C-class is fair. Obviously I believe the subject matter is important, but I agree that this article could be improved and expanded and should be in order to give the subject the respect it deserves. Tina Cordon (talk) 23:14, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I certainly agree it is an important subject - considering the impact the canal had on the industrial revolution in Manchester I'd say it's right up at the top of things to do history-wise for Manchester. I have tried to gain access to those mines to take a photographic record (I am a television cameraman by trade) but unfortunately, and somewhat understandably, British Coal are extremely reluctant to allow anyone to have anything to do with any aspect of the mines. We've been trying to get the Bridgewater article improved, right now it's at GA but I feel it has a very long way to go until it's worthy of FAC. Parrot of Doom (talk) 23:53, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some in-line references and now that I've found Francis Egerton's pamphlet as mentioned below I will endeavour to expand the section referring to the underground incline. Tina Cordon (talk) 14:30, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Description du Plan Incliné Souterrain[edit]

The Description du Plan Incliné Souterrain by Francis Egerton is available for free download at Google Books. It is of course in French. Tina Cordon (talk) 14:30, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get it.[edit]

Is this place some kind of a nega-Venice? If Venice is aquatic heaven, then this place with its 47 miles of sub-terranean dungeon canals should be aquatic hell? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.83.33.58 (talk) 22:20, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coal board photo[edit]

I think this image is now in the public domain copyright wise:

http://www.transportarchive.org.uk/getobject.php?rnum=T1697&searchitem=tunnel&mtv=T1&pnum=1