Talk:Worcester Cold Storage and Warehouse Co. fire

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Image deletion notices (2009)

I have tagged File:Worcester6_mcguirk.gif, which is in use in this article for deletion because it does not have a copyright tag. If a copyright tag is not added within seven days the image will be deleted. --Chris 08:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged File:Worcester6_spencer.gif, which is in use in this article for deletion because it does not have a copyright tag. If a copyright tag is not added within seven days the image will be deleted. --Chris 08:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged File:Worcester_Cold_Storage_Warehouse_Fire.jpg, which is in use in this article for deletion because it does not have a copyright tag. If a copyright tag is not added within seven days the image will be deleted. --Chris 08:06, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

where is discussion how city let such a building be built, failure of fire department to give good training etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.24.40.252 (talk) 19:01, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Worcester Cold Storage and Warehouse Co. fire/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

References
  1. ^ http://www.usfa.dhr.gov/downloads/pdf/publications/tr-134.pdf
Link does not work.

Substituted at 02:18, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:21, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source for probation?[edit]

Is there a source stating that the two homeless people received probation? I can't find it in any of the linked sources, and typically when charges are dismissed someone doesn't end up on probation. I feel like this information should be removed until it can be sourced. Wreckingballheart (talk) 13:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Size of building[edit]

The article states "constructed in 1906 and covered an entire city block on Franklin Street. The original structure measured 88 by 88 feet (27 m × 27 m), and stood 80 feet (24 m) high." That can't be right. 88x88 is less than 8,000 square feet. Lakemirror (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:05, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]