Talk:Wilton Mall

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 13, 2006	Articles for deletion	Kept
December 17, 2007	Articles for deletion	Kept

Shopping Centers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state): Capital District

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Capital District (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Shopping mall#Regional|regional shopping center]] The anchor (#Regional) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled[edit]

I deleted this because it's a shopping mall. There are millions of buildings and malls in the world, few of them have any significance. In the interest of Wikipedia not being an indiscriminate list of trivia, I don't think we should encourage this sort of thing. Thoughts? Friday (talk) 14:48, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can we talk about the merits of the article instead of arguing procedure? I don't want to list this on the already overcrowded and dysfunctional Afd if there's a way to avoid it. Friday (talk) 15:07, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

People are working on this page, and so I don't think it's appropriate to just blank the page on them based on your personal opinion. Is XD still alive anyway? There are better and more adopted mechanisms like prod going these days, and a sample of the XD7 category indicate you are virtually alone. I think there is enough here that a reasonable article could be built including historical information, etc. I would label it as a stub and move on. However, I would not vote against deletion. I just think your blanking of the page is presumptuous, particularly when it's replaced after a user edits it. cmh 15:14, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, no arguments here. The only reason I re-XD'd is it that no explanation was offered at all against the argument for deletion. In fact, I still haven't heard any arguments against deletion. This appears to be Just Another Mall, same as millions of others in the world. There's nothing to be said about it except for trivia. Friday (talk) 15:20, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Former Tenants[edit]

Afterthoughts
Annie’s Gourmet Ice Cream
Athlete’s Foot
Athletic Kids
A & W
Barbara Moss
Bavarian Pretzel
Cartoon Corner
Casual Corner
Champs Sports
County Seat
Cutlery World
Cutting Crew
CVS
Deb Shop
Earring Tree
Earth Shop
Eye World
Freshens Yogurt
Friar Tuck Bookstore
Gadzooks
Gap
Garden Botanika
J. Riggings
Kinney Shoes
Klein’s All Sports
Lady Foot Locker
Lane Bryant
Lazerpix
Lechters
McDonalds
Merry Go Round
N.Fox Jewelers
Nature’s Touch
$9.99 Stockroom
Northern Reflections
Office m’Art
Original Cookie Co.
Pagemax
Petite Sophisticate
Pet World
Pizza Hut
Rocky Mountain Traders
Ruffino’s Pastries
Something Sweet
Time Out Amusement
Wilson’s Leather
Yester Year Gifts

(moved from main page by TenPoundHammer 22:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

closures[edit]

Closures should be removed as they become increasingly more irrelevant quivkly what do you think?Incredible93 (talk) 21:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closures are important to anyone who's interested in the history of the Mall. Also, I see no reason to remove the "Movie theater" section. M.Bitton (talk) 22:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]