This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The section "Donaldson and capital requirements" (which used to be called "Influence of tenure on the credit markets crisis of 2007-08") is heavily unbalanced toward a certain viewpoint. The author is suggesting that Donaldson indirectly caused the financial meltdown of 2007-2008. That simply isn't true. Take this analogy: Harlem is a neighborhood with a high murder rate. But, over the years, the rate has gone down. Consequently, the police commissioner decreases the number of police units assigned to the area. Two years after this decrease, there is a horrible shooting in the neighborhood that kills six people. Is the commissioner responsible for those shootings? Of course not. Yes, if s/he hadn't decreased the number of units in the neighborhood, perhaps the shooting wouldn't have happened. But, still, no one knows for sure that the shootings wouldn't have happened. Maybe they would have happened anyway. And, regardless, the commissioner's actions are a far cry from having caused the shooting. Anyone who would say otherwise would be propogating a distortion. This is exactly what has happened with this section. It propagates the distortion that Donaldson caused (directly or indirectly) the meltdown. That just isn't true. ask123 (talk) 14:58, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, the section basically refers to only one source: an article from The New York Times. The author has included other sources but merely to back up general knowledge. S/he references a page from the SEC that documents the meeting that is being referred to. But, essentially, the opinion of the author comes from this Times article.
I'll give editors a few days to clean the section up. After that, I'm changing it, or, more likely, just deleting it. ask123 (talk) 15:06, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)