Talk:Whittington Tump/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 11:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

  • Where is the alt name of "Crookbarrow Hill" mentioned/referenced in the main body?
Mentioned and reffed - Dumelow (talk) 05:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Feel free to link Worcestershire, I imagine a high portion of our readers have no idea.
Linked and added England also
  • Could you be a touch more specific in the lead to those of who do know where Worcs is, whereabouts in Worcs?
went with "central Worcestershire" - Dumelow (talk) 05:52, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "clayey" might be worth linking, this is such an awful word, and it may confuse.
Linked to clay. Flashbacks to an engineering geology course ("grey sandy well-graded sub-rounded gravel with silt" etc.) - Dumelow (talk) 06:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Should The Red Book of Worcester be in italics and indeed linked if notable?
Indeed yes. Italicised and linked, another to add to the list of articles to create! - Dumelow (talk) 06:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The tump, recognisable" is there a dicdef/link/footnote for "tump"? It's certainly a word I'm unaware of.
There is a basic definition at Wiktionary but I think the opening paragraph at list of tumps (to which [[tump) redirects) is better (though unreferenced), linked - Dumelow (talk) 06:04, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "as a land mark" one word or two?
Went with landmark as or article is at that name - Dumelow (talk) 06:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "pre-historic"/ prehistoric.
Went with prehistoric as our article is at that name - Dumelow (talk) 06:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "passed in Middlesex" link.
Linked - Dumelow (talk) 06:07, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's all I have on a first read. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 20:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review The Rambling Man, I think I've addressed your poitns above - Dumelow (talk) 06:07, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]