Talk:Where No One Has Gone Before/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 01:03, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Plot" section: Please link the actors names after the people they play.
  • Also, link Wesley Crusher.
  • This note is for both the above. I'd included these in the lead, but it doesn't hurt to repeat it in the plot section as well, so both of those are added. Miyagawa (talk) 21:51, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm glad you noted "Where No One has Gone Before," but please also note the Traveler returns in a later episode which signals the end of Wesley Crusher's appearances on TNG.
  • Done. Amusingly enough, Keith DeCandido posted his re-watch of that episode only a week ago. Hopefully he'll move onto DS9 once he's done with TNG as his re-watches in particular are very useful. Miyagawa (talk) 21:51, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Themes is a little short of a section. I'd suggest it be either expanded or merged into another section.
  • When you mention Argyle, it isn't immediately clear that LaForge isn't chief engineer yet. You might want to explain this.
  • Just one duplicate link again (Robert Justman)!
  • Found one for Eric Menyuk too, so fixed both. Menyuk incidently retired from acting and now a lawyer. Miyagawa (talk) 21:51, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • One of the external links is returning a soft 404. Any chance you could check it out?
  • Thank goodness for the Wayback Machine! Managed to get an archived version through archive.org. Miyagawa (talk) 21:51, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The images appear to be properly licensed. Dab links are fine.
  • Similarly to Themes, I think release should be folded into the reception section.
  • Changed it to a subsection of reception. Miyagawa (talk) 21:51, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think you should put some info in the reception section in the lead, so it properly summarizes the entire article.
On hold pending improvements. —Ed!(talk) 02:29, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great work! Passing the GA. —Ed!(talk) 02:15, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]