Talk:What's past is prologue
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Links[edit]
This quote is significantly beyond my grasp. I went to Wikipedia and couldn't find any info so I thought I could get the ball rolling. Here are a couple links I found that might be of help:
- http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ702238&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ702238
- http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/10.01/timeline.html (Wired article with Past as Prologue as the title)
- http://www.cambridge.org/uk/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=0521619637
Mcoogan75 (talk) 07:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Redundancies[edit]
The sentence "The phrase was originally used in The Tempest, Act 2, Scene I. Antonio uses it to suggest that all that has happened before that time, the "past", has led Sebastian and him to this opportunity to do what they are about to do: commit murder, or make another choice." in the intro and the sentence "The phrase was originally used in The Tempest, Act 2, Scene I. Antonio uses it to suggest that all that has happened before that time, the "past," has led Sebastian and himself to this opportunity to do what they are about to do: commit murder." under 'Historical meaning' are nearly identical. Is there any way to resolve this redundancy or is it ok as it is? --Landfish7 (talk) 02:37, 3 December 2021 (UTC)