Talk:West Brompton station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on West Brompton station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:01, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The station's architecture[edit]

Dear All, with the dramatic loss of Earl's Court exhibition centre and the current grievous despoliation of the historic Lillie Bridge Depot engineering and railway works nearby, the WB station and the adjacent Lillie road bridge remain as the only railway assets. Both are the work of Sir John Fowler, 1st Baronet. We need an article on the Lillie bridge Depot, but it's not my specialism. Thank you for any help with this.--Po Kadzieli (talk) 20:01, 26 February 2016 (UTC) PS maybe the Low Importance category needs reviewing in the light of the foregoing?--Po Kadzieli (talk) 20:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]