Talk:West Bletchley
 | Buckinghamshire Start‑class (inactive) | ||||||
| |||||||
Merge back proposals[edit]
The newly created articles for Far Bletchley, Old Bletchley and West Bletchley District are , in my view insufficiently notable to survive. I propose that they be merged back into West Bletchley if the content is going to survive WP:AFD. Velella Velella Talk 12:57, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:13, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on West Bletchley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090608003948/http://www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/parishes/DisplayArticle.asp?ID=17026 to http://www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/parishes/DisplayArticle.asp?ID=17026
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:06, 5 December 2017 (UTC)