Talk:Warangal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

New section[edit]

Indian census is conducted only at 10-year intervals, and the last one was in 2001. There was no census in 2006. But since I am unaware what census the population figures were taken from, I have just inserted a citation needed template --Manojb 12:50, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Being the capital of most well known telugu kingdom in its history and also its monuments are still being used by state government for represeting telugu culture, having no photos here is bad. Somebody from Warangal please take pictures of its fort and temples and post here. Or perhaps we can use some pictures from government website. Mlpkr 07:38, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Yes. The most well-known pictures of Warangal gate and Ramappa temple would serve the purpose. and warangal is best place for the new state telangana —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.63.100.117 (talk) 08:28, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is an obvios error in population and area. How can it be 4th largest when area and population stated are bigger than Hyderabad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.195.211.39 (talk) 06:51, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A problem of definition and focus[edit]

I have opened a discussion at the India Project Noticeboard relating to the focus of this and related articles. - Sitush (talk) 07:57, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Warangal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:25, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]