Talk:Walt Simonson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Signature[edit]

It'd be nice to see an image of the distinctive signature mentioned in the article. --Jabberwocky, ultranewb.

Do an enlargement of either or both image at the bottom--that is click on it, then click on it again, and scroll to the bottom. His dinosaur signature is on both. Also , just a friendly suggestion: sign your posts with four tilde characters in talk pages. Jplatt39 14:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Walt's is so distinctive that I added a picture of it...whether it stays in the infobox or moves into the main article depends on what the Comics project thinks about putting artists' signatures in the infoboxes in general. Afabbro 06:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Xfactor251series.jpg[edit]

Image:Xfactor251series.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:12, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Xfactor251series.jpg[edit]

Image:Xfactor251series.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:38, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bad time lines?[edit]

The wiki states that Simonson both wrote and inked The Mighty Thor for a period in the 1980s which ended with #367 (May 1986). I have here a copy of a The Mighty Thor #376 (Feb. 1987) which was done by Walt as well. Does anybody have the correct time frame for his work on this series? (Daystrom (talk) 07:03, 7 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Time line is CORRECT! Please re-read the paragraph. It states that Simonson stopped drawing the stories with #367 but continued to write the book until #382. Also, the book's title was "Thor". It didn't become "The Mighty Thor" until #413. The indicia (the tiny print usually on the bottom of the first page) is what the Overstreet Price Guide and other source use for the title of the book.

Mtminchi08 (talk) 18:12, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The intro[edit]

I don't want to mess with the article much myself, but someone should take a look at the intro. Currently it has three sentences about StarSlammers and no mention of Thor, and that seems all out of balance. Perhaps something more along the lines of "For his college thesis, he created a comic book featuring his original characters the StarSlammers, who he would later produce new adventures of as a professional. He is known for such works as an influential run on Marvel's Thor and his collaborations with writer Archie Goodwin on Manhunter and the New York Times best-selling graphic novel adaptation of the movie Alien." --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:39, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh. I see what you mean. How did that happen? All that material on his education, which has mostly nothing to do with his notability, and which should be in an Early life section?? I wonder how that slipped past me over the past few years. Thanks for pointing it out, Nat. I've rewritten it. Nightscream (talk) 02:44, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good job! Thanks for taking care of that. --Nat Gertler (talk) 02:47, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oooh, one small factual niggle: "Louise Simonson (née Jones)" isn't right, as "née" refers to the name you were born with, "Jones" was a prior married name. --Nat Gertler (talk) 05:02, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, got it. Nightscream (talk) 16:39, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lead-y remarks from someone who has never heard of any of these people or works:

  1. On the latter, why not say/write "Louise Simonson (previously Jones, née Alexander)" or "the former Louise Jones née Alexander". (Neither a spouse nor a co-author generally belongs in the lead but she may belong here.)
  2. Visiting for another purpose (see first edit summary), I improved the lead sentence (wh remains too long) and second sentence as a copy-editor, but incorporating a fact from target article Star Slammers.
  3. As copy-editor of the second paragraph I referred below to sections 5-6 and refs 35-38. They support Adams and McFarlane, not Adams and Hitch, nor does 'Hitch' otherwise appear on the page.

--P64 (talk) 02:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The current version, which has "née" for both names, is just wrong, as Jones was not her maiden name (which is what née is for), but just an earlier birth name. I have a COI (I know the Simonsons), but I'd argue for keeping just the Jones - it was the name that she established herself professionally under, so this allows the knowledgable reader to recognize which professional also makes up this comics power couple. The maiden name doesn't really convey information of import on the subject at hand. --Nat Gertler (talk) 03:47, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Walt Simonson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Walt Simonson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:27, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Walt_Simonson&oldid=1198861948"