Talk:Walls of Dubrovnik/GA1
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Very good.
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- No, the citation style is incositent; internet references lack author, access date, publisher, etc. Published works lack city of origin &, in some cases, the its issue date.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Yes, all quotes, statistics, and facts likely to be challenged have been cited.
- C. No original research:
- Nil.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Covers the prominent aspects of its existence.
- B. Focused:
- Yes.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Somewhat. In future avoid words that don't impart facts (e.g. "old") if circumstances allow. But, of course I acknowledge that some older sources can't be coherently dated.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- All in order.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Yes, but does there need to be so many?
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Yes.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
