Talk:Wake (comics)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

Propose that the article be moved per the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (comics) guideline, to fall in line with all the others using (comics). Anyone have strong feelings and good reason why not? MURGH disc. 09:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move done. MURGH disc. 21:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More info[edit]

There appears to be a different artist, Jose Munuera, doing a series about when Navee was a child growing up. The official website appears to be poukram.org. --BlueNight (talk) 06:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These were added to the article in a March 2nd, 2008 edit under Wake (comics)#Nävis --Cubbi (talk) 17:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison to Planetes[edit]

I don't recall seeing any nudity in Planetes. The comparison of adult themes between series seemes a bit ORish. That said, I do agree that it is an interesting example of censorship (if it can be referenced, currently the entire section has no refs).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 23:07, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The comic (manga) version of Planetes has one big nude scene at the end of phase 14 where Sally is trying to knock her crewmate Hachi out of a depression by offering him sex. In the TokyoPop versions published in english this scene occurs in volume 3 (ISBN1591825105) between pages 102-112. This is the most explicit sexual portrayal in the series, though there are constant innuendos and pornography floating around in zero gee. Wake has none of this. - jsuros


Classification of Issue 1 as Pornography in USA[edit]

Observed this personally at Amazing Al's Comics in Chula Vista, California, USA in 2000. Not sure how to cite this? - jsuros —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsuros (talkcontribs) 02:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV?[edit]

It seems a number of recent edits to this page have significantly changed the neutrality of this article. The introduction of words such as "needlessly" and "only" seems heavy-handed. I know little about the work in question, so I don't want to revert all the edits immediately. Someone with some familiarity with the topic should look into changing this. 94.193.52.157 (talk) 23:57, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The changes in question are clearly POV (some Frogs can't handle the fact that other languages exist...), and have been reverted. I thus removed the NPOV tag. -- Imladros (talk) 23:31, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]