Talk:Wadi al-Hasa

Jordan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jordan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jordan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JordanWikipedia:WikiProject JordanTemplate:WikiProject JordanJordan articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks YOU can help with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bible Low‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name[edit]

This wadi is in Jordan, and it is called Wadi al-Hasa. Different forms of "Hasa" are also how it appears in English maps. I suggest renaming the article appropriately.--84.108.213.97 (talk) 20:24, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate Redirect Here[edit]

Right now, "Zared" redirects to this article. It shouldn't. The biblical brook Zared or Zered has not been identified, and so it is not certain that the biblical Zared is the Wadi al-Hasa. I understand there's some kind of process involving consensus that needs to be established before messing with redirects, so I haven't gone ahead and made the fix myself.Alephb (talk) 14:02, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hydrology needs reworking[edit]

The entire hydrology section (Wadi al-Hasa#Geography) is very poorly put together. The user can't take much from it. I tried to fix it a bit, superficially, but it needs proper reworking, preferably by using English-language sources, as poor translation from Arabic might be the cause of many vagueries and inaccuracies.

Is the Arabic source at the top of the last paragraph meant to cover it all? I mean the atlas published in Beirut. As of now, most of that paragraph is unsourced. Arminden (talk) 19:34, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No distinction made between valley and wider area[edit]

! Arminden (talk) 15:08, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]