Talk:Victoria Island

Canada: Northwest Territories / Nunavut / Geography Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian Territories.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian Territories.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

Arctic

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arctic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arctic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArcticWikipedia:WikiProject ArcticTemplate:WikiProject ArcticArctic articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

[Untitled][edit]

There is a little notch in the boundary between Nunavut and the Northwest Territories. It would be nice, if someone knew why that notch is there, could explain it. Ducky 04:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Traditional land use. The boundary commission would have determined that the lake was being used more by people from Ulukhaktok, Northwest Territories than from Kugluktuk, Nunavut or Cambridge Bay, Nunavut. It also might have been to help compensate for the loss of access to other parts of the island and the mainland that are now part of Nunavut. But of course no sources. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 11:48, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why split it up?[edit]

If the citizens of Ulakhaktok are mostly Native People won't they want to be in the new territory of Nunavut?

The Inuvialuit people of Ulukhaktok, Sachs Harbour and Paulatuk along with the Inuvialuit of Tuktoyaktuk, Inuvik and Aklavik all belong to the Inuvialuit Settlement Region and is a different land claims group than that covering the Inuit of Nunavut, see Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Size inconsistency[edit]

There is an inconsistency with the wikipedia list of islands by size - this article states that Victoria is larger than Great Britain, while List of islands by area lists Great Britain 7th, Honshu 8th and Victoria 9th. Neezes (talk) 09:53, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The list was changed and didn't match the source. I fixed it, here. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:29, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Victoria Island (Canada). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:23, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 October 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. per discussion (non-admin closure) –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 17:26, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

– This seems to be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for Victoria Island; this island has almost three times as many average pageviews as Victoria Island, Lagos, and more than twenty times the average pageviews of any other. It also seems confusing to have this page be titled "Victoria Island (Canada)" when there are other Victoria Islands (such as this one) that are in Canada as well. ModernDayTrilobite (talk) 14:54, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm inclined to support, but nom should first at least link the mentioned pageview evidence. Dicklyon (talk) 04:01, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a link to the pageviews; apologies for not linking it before, I'd had some trouble getting the formatting to work within the move-request template. ModernDayTrilobite (talk) 17:38, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support It was at the undisabiguated title at one time. Reason it's at (Canada) is because it crosses two territories. It could have been (Arctic Ocean). CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:25, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.