Talk:Veðrfölnir and eagle/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: maclean (talk) 03:10, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- One grammatical error noted below.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Short article but I've reviewed the background and I think it covers everything adequately.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- It is stable.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- 2 images, both WPCommons-hosted public domain images.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Notes
- "may have been influenced by these Asiatic cosmologies from a northern." - there is a missing word here: from a northern what?
- "...asks High what other notable facts..." - can an adjective be provided indicating who High is? Like "asks the deity High..." or "asks High, a wise deity,...".
- Both issues fixed. Thanks for reviewing the article! :bloodofox: (talk) 03:06, 24 January 2010 (UTC)