Talk:Vaivasvata Manu

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hinduism: Krishnaism High‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Krishnaism (assessed as High-importance).

Retitle[edit]

I think Vaivasvata Manu is a more widely known name then Shradhadeva. Any objections if I retitle the page? Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 10:32, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:04, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 June 2021[edit]

Shraddhadeva Manu → Vaivasvata Manu – Vaivasvata Manu is far more common in WP:RS than Shraddhadeva Manu. Eg. [1], [2], [3], [4]. Even in the past, another user also proposed this move but no one responded. .245CMR.•^👥📜 04:43, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:47, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@245CMR: Some of these edits say that Shraddhadeva Manu is son of Vaivasvata Manu, and thus that the two are distinct individuals. It looks like that someone who knows plenty about Hinduism needs to give a ruling here. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:55, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Anthony Appleyard: No they are the same, the name Vaivasvata Manu is derived from Vivasvan (his father who is also called Surya). Shraddhadeva is an uncommon epithet which means "husband of Shraddha"..245CMR.•^👥📜 12:58, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Anthony Appleyard: Also, the revision which you are referring is not supported by reliable sources. You may check Vaivasvata Manu's children in the sources which I provided..245CMR.•^👥📜 13:02, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

The fish avatara of Vishnu saves Manu during the great deluge.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:34, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Conversation between Manu and Brihaspati.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

The fish avatara of Vishnu saves Manu during the great deluge.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:54, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]