Talk:Undress code

Nudity Low‑importance

	Nudity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nudity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of nudity and naturism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NudityWikipedia:WikiProject NudityTemplate:WikiProject Nuditynudity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

When the POVs and unreferenced material is all removed there is nothing left- the basketball stuff is adequately covered in that article. Undress code seems to be a joke term with no substance. r to my talk page I am not watching, I suggest {{delete}} --ClemRutter (talk) 21:05, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources for the term dharmic religions?[edit]

Where are the reliable sources that use the term dharmic religions in the context of this article? Dharmic religions is a now deleted obscure neologism and should not be used throughout Wikipedia. Andries 15:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is not an obscure neologism. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 17:03, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If it is not an obscure neologism then it would be easy to provide multiple reliable sources books, peer reviewed articles etc. I am waiting. I am also waiting for use of the phrase in the context of this article. Andries 17:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to use the alternative phrase Indian religions. The number of google scholar results for "Indian religions"+"Indian religion" is (45.600 + 84.200) while it is only (492+475) for "dharmic religions" +"dharmic religion". See Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_September_8. Andries 19:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question about types of jobs.[edit]

Hi. I read on here, that some jobs require the service provider to be underdressed. Which jobs are these, as I don't see any examples, in the article.

Thanks, for your time. --Hacker1 (talk) 18:22, 29 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

External link removed[edit]

This external link to The Costumer's Manifesto is dead, but more pertinently seems from an archive copy to have been nothing more than a big list of mildly-organized links regarding Victorian clothing. I've left it here in case anyone wants do dig around for any useful information about historical reductions in clothing.--Anon423 (talk) 15:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]