Talk:Underlying event

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 2 November 2015 by reviewer SwisterTwister (talk · contribs).

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I've decdied to make a page like this for several reasons. I think though initially not so good as they may be, that pages like this will eventually be filled out by somebody. Also, they are needed to complete the understanding of some rather hard articles. Ema--or (talk) 20:25, 29 October 2015 (UTC) PS I've decided to have minimal classification here, to see if these pages get noticed by anybody.[reply]

Attempt two[edit]

I have decided to go through a different channel, due to yesterday's speedy deletion. I do insist on this article, as I believe this article is one whose time has come. Ema--or (talk) 19:17, 30 October 2015 (UTC) PS Also, I suppose a revieewer may be able to identify someone who can improve this submission. Ema--or (talk) 19:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wish you well with this. Please ensure that you address the issue that led to yesterday's deletion, which was that your lede was an overly close copy from the source at https://muon.wordpress.com/2010/03/26/underlying-event-a-definitive-study-by-cdf/. It needs to be put into your own words, instead. --Gronk Oz (talk) 01:47, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]