Talk:Unconventional warfare (United States)

Unconventional warfare (United States) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Military history: Intelligence / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Context of this article[edit]

It is intended to be about U.S. doctrine, branching from the globalised article insurgency. There is an article called unconventional warfare, to which this article has no relationship.

My goal is to have articles on the other U.S. doctrines for special operations, such as the work-in-progress foreign internal defense. As time and expertise permit, I'd also like to see articles on other national and regional doctrines.

Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 15:25, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I should add that special reconnaissance was not intended to be explictly U.S., but, again given the amount of U.S. doctrine published versus that of other countries, it can be considered a companion of this article. Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 20:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Unconventional warfare (United States Department of Defense doctrine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:38, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]