Talk:Ultrasonic pulse velocity test

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfC Comments[edit]

  • Comment: Specifically, see WP:NOTHOWTO. As well, the Procedure section contains quite the use of the word "we", which does not conform to WP:TONE. Not to mention that it is a step by step instruction (hence WP:NOTHOWTO). You may also wish to explain why the test should be conducted according to IS13311-1992, as well as briefly explain what IS13311-1992 is (though I recognise that you include it in a reference), and how this would impact the test and/or its results. As well, the ref tags should be spaced so that the directly support the content from them. Also, try to make sure that there is not more than one link per ref tag, as this makes it easier to determine what is proven by what source. Ref tags should not close out paragraphs, they should close out sentences. Thank you, -- Orduin Discuss 21:06, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: This may be a notable test, but we'll need to see some reliable, independent (third-party) sources that discuss the subject in significant detail, so we know that it's not just original research. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks, /wia /talk 20:11, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Usage[edit]

The link included is to an Iranian website, not Indian. I recommend to remove the link. --Fantadu (talk) 11:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]