Talk:Ultra long-haul

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Should this article exist?[edit]

The Longest flights article is more detailed, tho perhaps it doesn't have the history that this one does. But I can't see any point in retaining this one. Can I suggest merging it into the other one? Boscaswell talk 03:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I entirely agree, @Boscaswell has absolutely valid points, there is no additional value in maintaining this article which also has lots of factual flaws as well as repetitiveness for a poorly defined topic, how do we go about proceeding with this? DigitalExpat (talk) 11:40, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its been 6 months with no response/suggest consider merging this outdated/redundant article into Longest flights? 07:28, 3 December 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DigitalExpat (talk • contribs)

History section misleading[edit]

In addition to the valid question in the topic above, worth noting that the "history section" is very light on details and misleading, for example 34 of the world's currently operating longest flight routes are blocked for 16hrs+, yet this is not inferred or mentioned here. While it does contain some of the more notable/well-known historical ULH routes, it falls short in providing a strong representation of the now relatively common ULH nature of flights as commercial aviation gravitates away from hub-and-spoke to point-to-point models. DigitalExpat (talk) 11:23, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Entire page is dated[edit]

Outdated source some are over 10 years old with no updates... smh 100.38.247.36 (talk) 13:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]