Talk:USS Grayling (SSN-646)

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Untitled[edit]

Your information is all wrong about the collision with the Soviet boat. I know I was there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.203.177.94 (talk) 16:02, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To further the above comment, I wasn't there but as an ex-submariner I will say that the collison section in this article is garbage. Submarines have no combat information center. "Noise Diagram", and "noise triangulation", and "squirrel" are unclear, unused phrases, even in inside jargon. Further, I highly doubt the CO was trying to surface the boat with no flooding casualty, and momentum would allow surfacing to be easier vice more difficult as implied. "Acoustic channel" is not the correct phrase to describe the phenomenon mentioned. I'm tempted to delete the whole section as it is heresay. Comments? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.127.152.198 (talk) 02:15, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]