Talk:Tundish

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 13 August 2007 by reviewer Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs).

Metalworking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Metal working[edit]

The metal-working topic is specific and derived from the general topic. It would be misleading to state simply that a tundish belongs only to the metalworking topic. —Centrx→talk • 20:19, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Metal working is where Tundish is most widely seen. I think this page needs development in that direction. Iarpitsingla (talk) 12:03, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, but IMHO the page should be split, with the material perhaps absorbed into other articles. A metal-working Tundish appears to be a form of large jug or sauce-boat. A plumbing Tundish, required as a safety item in UK domestic unvented (so pressurised) hot water systems, is essentially a downwards pipe with a shrouded air-gap through which fault water can be seen if flowing. Similar things can be used for (non-fault) rain- and/or grey- water, but I don't know what they are called. 94.30.84.71 (talk) 20:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dictionary entries[edit]

I dispute maintaining dictionary entries, per WP:NOTDICT. I understand that the term "tundish" has other meanings, but this article is only about the metalworking meaning of the term. If others feel that other meanings of the term should remain in Wikipedia, then please make a new article for each of the meanings. Wizard191 (talk) 03:01, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Two comments on that: Firstly it's under "Tundish" not disambiguated, so our default position is that it's about them in general, not one specific need. There's a balance (i.e. no obvious priority) between contemporary casting and plumbing uses.

Secondly, etymology is still interesting to founders. This word has a very obvious etymology from brewing and I see no benefit to losing this short para from this article, no mattter what its overall scope. Wiktionary isn't an exclusive place for content - we can justify having the origins in both places.

Ideally I'd see this article as keeping the broad scope and including history, casting and plumbing. All three are strongly related - the basic function of a tundish is unchanged, no matter what its contents. They're all also fairly minor uses within their fields, so there's no need to split the article solely on volume. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:51, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand having the etymology here, however, the plumbing topic, is not part of the etymology therefore I think it should still be removed per WP:NOTDICT: "Encyclopedia articles should begin with a good definition and description of one topic (or a few largely or completely synonymous or otherwise highly related topics), but the article should provide other types of information about that topic as well. An encyclopedic definition is more concerned with encyclopedic knowledge (facts) rather than linguistic concerns." Essentially, there should only be one topic per article. Wizard191 (talk) 14:53, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tundish. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930190011/http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/Sk/Skull.html to http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/Sk/Skull.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]