Talk:Truist Field

Baseball Low‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: North Carolina Stub‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Event Venues (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles

Why is this an article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.188.108.70 (talk) 05:52, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Wbm1058 (talk) 20:53, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BB&T Ballpark (Charlotte) → BB&T BallPark (Charlotte) – Press coverage uses CamelCase. — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:14, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Vchimpanzee: Press coverage is mixed. This recent story on the Charlotte Knights' site doesn't use camel case. But I see that the sign in the infobox photo does (but maybe they just didn't want to have a lowercase "p" dipping below the top of the roof. BallPark isn't a word, it's a red-link. I'm inclined to keep it where it is, but if you want to boldly move to the red link, as a Proper Name that doesn't run afoul of MOS:TM, I won't object. Trademarks in CamelCase are a judgment call. CamelCase may be used where it reflects general usage and makes the trademark more readable. I'm not sure this crosses the bar to general usage, it seems more like spotty usage to me. And the non-camel version is perfectly readable. Wbm1058 (talk) 19:40, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fine with me. I wasn't sure.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:42, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And I was thinking if there is some usage of CamelCase, the article should at least say it.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:45, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Wbm1058 (talk) 20:53, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on BB&T Ballpark (Charlotte). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]